Mysteries of Dirac’s Dark Sea
E/C
Dark Gravity by Rod Kawecki
The largest star in the known Universe is dying and will soon explode.
Large celestials come from deep within the space grid towards the end explode
into a supernova event but what about universe’s. On a scale of what physicists
call multi-verse universes are made in numbers like galaxies and planets. But where do all these large celestial types
come from?
We can suggest that our universe is like many others out there and like
any other universe that might exist out there has given birth to many galaxies
stars and planets over time. But if this analogy is correct and the universe is
what gives planets and galaxies birth than if we follow the same spectrum our
universe like many others that might exist out there are doing the same. Dose
our universe arrive from a primeval atom for its source or does it arrive from
a greater celestial? If so then this greater celestial must be very large very
large indeed. It’s what has given birth to multiple galaxies that stars and
planets have evolved from. When we look at the specific’s we discover that the
line of origin of our galaxies and stars all come simultaneously from the
greater deity down to the smallest deity or star and not the opposite. Not from
the smaller to the larger as physics explains today. This is the reason I have
written this book on dark stars. On the dark side of the spectrum dark stars
seem to have been born in the earliest origin of our universes time spectrum
but we only observe that which has come out from within it. We see the development
of the galaxies and stars brought forth and don’t seem to be able to observe
any origin of its beginning. The closest we observe to a galactic birth is a
dark star or is the dark star just an inhabitant of a greater celestial we call
the universe?
The Dark Star Universe arrives
from the idea that celestials come from a greater existence. One invisible to
the naked eye and hides within the centre of its creator yet gives birth to
galaxies and stars that reside all around it. The Dark Star Universe is one of
these deities we cannot observe because it is the observable birth place of
everything that exist in the observable universe in which we reside in as well.
When we research the facts that lay behind celestial gravity wells we discover
that a gravity well exist due to the presence of a larger celestial amidst its
entangling walls so when we research for answers about our universes origin we
discover what is put in the front of us and not what is behind us. We observe a
universe of expansion and pushes towards the outer walls of its gravity well in
a universe that has lost sight of its beginning centre point. Our sights are
pointed towards the universes future when we are looking for its origin
beginning.
The universe is to the best of theoretical knowledge is infinite. The dark matter which we observe as darkness
is an infinite terrain whereas the matter at the galactic and planetary scale
is measured as being finite. We observe the universe as a three dimensional
imagery. When we look up at the stars at
night we see bright reflections of imagery from different angles from the sun
different reflections from different areas and suns abroad. We don’t see the whole picture. The dark
fabric the projectile the planets and stars lay upon is as dark as the empty
space we observe when a light is turned off in a vacant room.
We speak about the fabric of space as some sort of darken substance
fabric which keeps in position everything of material matter occupying specific
areas in empty space. A planet for instance takes up a specific amount of area
in the empty space and is impressed on the dark fabric by its weight, size and
mass. Specifically, energy flows towards
a center of the mass this is a fact of physics that seems to be over looked
upon in some scientific studies preferably by the theory of gravity so we can
safely say that a planets mass resist or repels the dark space due to its
steady state pressure existing on an infinite scale or terrain of empty space
because all energy matter mass flows towards its center.
Dark fabric acts as a terrain from which everything that exist as a
material entity is impressed within what may be called a impressed space
curvature fabric hole an area the star or planets reside embedded deep in the
dark fabric matter. When we look up in the sky at all the stars and planets we
only see what reflects from the light rays from our sun or other suns that
exist out there. Because planetary matter of all its sorts are impressed in a
space field grid matter forming a fabric hole in the space fabric causes the
space to bend and curve. This curvature forms impressed dark material fabric
gravity wells fabric holes) which due to the planets depressed state and depth
and weight in the fabric forms fabric curves that depending on the size mass of
the galaxy, planet or star can hide other planet celestials that lay in the
same directional view. It’s not until a spacecraft might maneuver close to a
specific star or planet system that observation on the other side of the primary
planetary direction can be observed.
Space retains specific curves planetary system fabric disk plates that
also maneuver from which large suns or planetary system stars or celestial
spheres deepen the fabric of space form solar system activity like our own
solar system in it. System disk plates
form caused by these different systems of planetary bodies that maneuver as a
whole system separated from other deeply embedded celestial systems nearby are
formed as they are separated star systems orbiting by a dominion planet or sun
like our solar system.
Making observations like I have just explained here about our universe
and the fabric terrain it resides positioning galactic matter is the
consciousness The Quanta Physics Theory ‘maintains for its new primary
directive about our universe’s existence. All these curves and twists of the
fabric of space makes it seem to be viewed differently than previous advance
physics describes from over the centuries. Making this statement we can look at
a young universe in the midst of a new universe rather than those reviews from
what is called ‘The Big Bang Theory”. This new view changes the idea that the
universe or any universe might maneuver through a stage we have neglected to
observe in science due to changes made over the decades by leading
scientists.
We observe all the celestial galactic and planetary plantations alike as
matter embedded impressing itself curving the fabric of space as a flat
diminishing horizon of endless terrain at each specific astronomical distance
as far away and just keep going. Albert Einstein once stated that if a
spacecraft was to maneuver in a specific direction at the end of the journey it
would end at the same place from which it started. This statement makes the
universe character model as a round entity.
On the celestial faraway we also observe the foundation as celestial in
nature round infinitely distance and without end. But what is it that we don’t see? This leads
Quanta Physics Theory to a new and remote fabulous idea about the universe
never before researched. This new
foundation to the ethical reasoning of this new theory about space, time and
the universe leads me to believe that entity we entitle to be a universe in
nature is actually Celestial based on the facts.
A dark star is a theoretical object compatible with Newtonian mechanics
that, due to its large mass, has a surface escape velocity that equals or
exceeds the speed of light. How light is affected by gravity under Newtonian
mechanics is questionable but if it were accelerated the same way as
projectiles, any light emitted at the surface of a dark star would be trapped
by the star’s gravity, rendering it dark, hence the name. Unlike a modern black
hole, the object behind the horizon is assumed to be stable against collapse.
In the 1700s, there were some who proposed that a super massive object
might draw light into it. Newtonian optics was a corpuscular theory of light,
treating light as particles.
An early John Michell published paper in 1784 predicted that an object
with a radius 500 times that of the sun (but the same density) would have an
escape velocity of the speed of light at its surface, and thus be invisible.
Interest in the theory died in the 1900s, however, as the wave theory of light
took prominence.
When rarely referenced in modern physics, these theoretical entities are
referred to as "dark stars" to distinguish them from true black
holes.
Within months of Einstein's publication of general relativity in 1916,
the physicist Karl Schwartzchild produced a solution to Einstein's equation for
a spherical mass (called the Schwartzchild metric) ... with unexpected results.
The term expressing the radius had a disturbing feature. It seemed that
for a certain radius, the denominator of the term would become zero, which
would cause the term to "blow up" mathematically. This radius, known
as the Schwartzchild radius, rs, is defined as:
rs = 2GM/c2
G is the gravitational constant, M is
the mass, and c is the speed of light.
Since Schwartzchild's work proved crucial to understanding black holes,
it is an odd coincidence that the name Schwartzchild translates to "black
shield."
An object whose entire mass M lies within rs is considered to be a black
hole Event horizon is the name given to rs, because from that radius the escape
velocity from the black hole's gravity is the speed of light. Black holes draw
mass in through gravitational forces, but none of that mass can ever escapes a
dark star is therefore invisible and clocked with dark empty space.
In the 1920s, physicists Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar deduced that any
star more massive than 1.44 solar masses (the Chadrasekhar limit) must collapse
under general relativity. Physicist Arthur Eddington believed some property
would prevent the collapse. Both were right, in their own way. Robert
Oppenheimer predicted in 1939 that a super massive star could collapse, thus
forming a "frozen star" in nature, rather than just in mathematics.
The collapse would seem to slow down; actually freezing in time at the point it
crosses rs.
When we observe the topic of Dark Stars or Black Hole scenario we
conclude that black holes absorb outside entities when the opposite is true.
Nothing can enter a dark star scenario black hole because it is the aftershock
of a collapsing by which matter exited as in big bang little bang theory.
Quanta Physics assumes that a black hole is actually a dark star aftermath. It
is the manner in which matter entered the empty space vortex matrix vacuum
during its birth that allowed surround cold empty space to intervene and freeze
it.
Dark Star Universe Theory is directed by the evidence that the brightest
of star can be hidden so dark in empty space that they change the area matrix
of space completely. When we resume the dark star theory we can direct our
theory with the idea that a dark mass can be formed that completely surrounds
mostly all the evidence of the star entangled in it. Agreeing that a matrix
star or dark star is one of the most extreme natures that universes might be
formed from we look at the theory that its matrix may change the nature of the
vacuum matter by absorbing positive radiation from the outer complex of the
dark stars atmosphere. As the matrix of the dark star absorbs positive
radiation from external sources like galaxy’s and clusters and such or even
radiation amidst the empty vacuum itself it forms a negative dwelling of dark
radiation it decays as it regenerates positive radiation energies. Since its
center of mass acts as an attraction force negative radiation is created at its
outer rim. The dark star than retains a self-rotational cycle we can also
assume that the flex-strength of deep dark space itself as a field is designed
with a protective pressure resistance’ characteristic that guards it against
great celestial types to overpower its ‘seams’ and cause rips in it. Another
scientific question is asked “where does matter come from in the midst of it
all”? Everything there in the material universe is a maintained terrain known
as space that retains infinite measure. This conceals the bright radiation it
possesses deep inside empty space. Outside the matrix of the dark star it is
the presence of an outer 3D rim fabric. As the dark star expands over time its
matrix grows showing the results of an expanding universe.
In 1795, Pierre-Simon Laplace, a French physicist who independently
reached the same conclusions, reasoned that: "it is therefore possible
that the greatest luminous bodies in the universe are on this account
invisible."
Both Mitchell and Laplace believed that the escape velocity, the speed
necessary to escape the star's gravity, for a sufficiently large star would be
greater than the speed of light. Because light could not escape from the
gravitational pull, the dark star would appear invisible to an observer against
the night sky. Both theories were based on Newton's theory of gravitation and
corpuscular light. In 1916, Albert
Einstein published his ground breaking paper on the General Theory of
Relativity by including gravitation; this theory completed his previous 1905
paper on the Special Theory of Relativity, which set the speed of light as
constant. General Relativity theorized that mass curves space and time and that
gravity are a result of that curvature.
A dark star was a theoretical object that obeyed the laws of Newtonian
mechanics, and has a surface escape velocity that equaled or exceeded the speed
of light. A crude calculation would tell us that light emitted at the surface
of a dark star should be trapped by the star’s gravity, but dark stars also
supported indirect radiation effects – light (and matter) leaving the star's
surface could escape a little way beyond the horizon before gravity turned it
around and pulled it back in, and during that brief visit, these emissions have
a chance of colliding with other passing particles and generating secondary
signals outside the horizon, or even being knocked completely free. These indirect-radiation
effects due to visiting particles generate effects that appear to have
counterparts under quantum mechanics that are usually blamed on virtual
particles.
A new and indirect statement about dark star universe’s are that they
build pressure that exceeds the deciphered kingship of physics mathematics and
could actually be escape pods that form celestial galaxies and cluster material
outside the dark stars outer rim but within its gravity well under the event
horizon. Over time these nebulas and galaxies formed inside then planets, stars
and star systems we observe today but orbit in a cycle around the invisible
dark star upper atmosphere grid.
“Indirect radiation" mechanism doesn't exist under Einstein's
general theory of relativity. Under GR1915's observer space conventions, since
a photon emitted at or below r= 2M can't reach a distant observer (without
help), it's considered never to have left the region bounded by the r = 2M
surface at all. Under GR, this special
surface (the event horizon) permanently screens off the contents of a black
hole from the outside universe. The GR1915 counterpart of the dark star is not
merely dark, its zero-emissions make it utterly black, and since the outside
observer can no longer sense any specifics about the event horizon's contents,
it no longer appears as a conventional body, but as something like an
informational "hole" (giving us the GR1915 phrase, "black
hole").
The case of indirect radiation from a (hypothetical) dark star now seems
to be accepted as a legitimate class of Hawking radiation (as an example of
indirect radiation through an acoustic horizon), albeit in a non-GR1915
context.
The dark star is capable of emitting indirect radiation – outward-aimed
light and matter can leave the r = 2M surface before being recaptured, and
whilst outside the critical surface, can interact with other matter, or be
accelerated free from the star by a chance encounter with other matter. A black
star is a gravitational object composed of matter. It is a theoretical
alternative to the black hole concept from general relativity. The theoretical
construct was created through the use of semi classical gravity theory. A
similar structure should also exist for the Einstein-Maxwell-Dirac equations
system, which is the (super) classical limit of quantum electrodynamics, and
for the Einstein-Yang-Mills-Dirac system, which is the (super) classical limit
of the standard model.
A black star need not have an event horizon but fabric dwellings like
gravity wells should also contend with universe singularity theory also, and
may or may not be a transitional phase between collapsing stars and a
singularity. A black star is created when matter compresses at a rate
significantly less than the free-fall velocity of a hypothetical particle
falling to the center of its star, because quantum processes create vacuum
polarization, which creates a form of degeneracy pressure, preventing
space-time (and the particles held within it) from occupying the same space at
the same time. This vacuum energy is theoretically unlimited, and if built up
quickly enough, will stop gravitational collapse from creating a singularity.
This may entail an ever-decreasing rate of collapse, leading to an infinite
collapse time, or asymptotically approaching a radius less than zero.
A black star with a radius slightly greater than the predicted event
horizon for an equivalent mass black hole will appear very dark, because almost
all light produced will be drawn back to the star, and any escaping light will
be severely gravitationally red shifted or mixed chemically away from the dark
stars outer rim scrape. It will appear almost exactly like a black hole. It
will feature Hawking radiation, as virtual particle pairs created in its
vicinity may still be split, with one particle escaping and the other being
trapped. Additionally, it will create thermal Planckian radiation that will
closely resemble the expected Hawking radiation of an equivalent black hole.
The predicted interior of a black star will be composed of this strange
state of space-time, with each length in depth heading inward appearing the
same as a black star of equivalent mass and radius with the over-lay stripped
off. Temperatures increase with depth towards the center.
You could say that a dark star may curve completely in on itself hiding
it complete hence naming it “A Dark Star”. The Universe star is a 3D gigantic
celestial sphere blacken day in nature which higher atmosphere is darken medium
realm dome that rotates within a deepen gravity well trapped as it pressurizes
itself against the dwellings walls that surround it trapped inside as it
orbits. Impressed space curvature with a centralized celestial sphere or planet
sitting inside curved deep space is
called a “ Gravity Well” because is resides amidst a physical mass which
radiation empowers an astronomical upper atmosphere of dark radiation mass due
to its rotation activity impressed in the empty space it occupies. Inside its
space curvature den it rotates in an elliptical cycling motion possibly causing
a flat line space fabric it lays on or it obtains rotation by résistance’ through multiverse theory that
physical remolds empty surrounding space near it where it occupies its position
or more so when you read more about Quanta Physics Mechanics the free fall
alignment of universe sphere haven free fallen from its physical development as
a celestial to hence we don’t know where or how should have put the universe
matter in a specific motion as it formed the space projectile path direction
preferably pointing downwards comparing direction like earth’s axis and north
and south poles. Here in this
explanation our dark star begins free fall motion with its physical size, mass
and weight comparable with the strength and density procurement of what is at
this date and time empty space. It’s not that a bunch of hydrogen atoms
gathered together to try and hold our celestial universe sphere in any type of
positioning. Rather the universe’s mass density and relative free fall weight
entailment as we retain new information in Quanta Physics about how weight
applies with object mass, energy mass and free fall activity that an extreme
multitude of weight, density field of mass centralization celestial activity
developed as the sphere gained midfield space free fall. Our descending
projectiles speed and free cycling mass viscously molded itself into a
weightless free cycling space curvature. We also discover that inside the dark
star matrix nothing can escape from inside its dwelling nor can anything from
outer it enter. This can be caused by a vast interception of empty cold space
mixing with the dark star birth an activity that allowed space to freeze the
dark star at its entre of birth. As our dark star grows denser in its multitude
of cycles against the space grid its gained inner material pressure rises and
it may release expressional fathoms’ of matter as described as from a cosmic
egg. These adopted ‘similar’ cosmic eggs called ‘embryus’ in Quanta Physics repel own like energy properties’ as we
observe that the new developed matrix of the cosmic egg is more material decay
rather than energy mass that forms as a weaker energy complex than the dark
star energy matrix it is released by.
One can confirm that a black star lies at the bottom of all known
galaxies throughout a third dimensional space. It is for this reason that in
1916 the theory about dark stars became known as being black holes because it
held that if our universe or any universe abroad empty space exists – the big bang
theory would not be plausible ethics reasoning in theoretical physics. The
logic of a stillborn universe would lean more to the idea that the big bang
never existed at all but would now become a logic directive matter probability. Three dimensional embryus dark star
universe’s due to the vastness of the dark itself impressed galactic matter is
caused by ‘like matter’ similar by chemical nature curve space due to the vast
density mass viciously pulled towards the dark stars center mass that otherwise
would be positioned closer to the stars surface grid crest line or dome
atmosphere under normal circumstances that because the dark stars fabricated
dark atmosphere is forced to lay outside the surface grid. ‘Wobble effects’
cause the specific time coordinates rotation of the galaxy orbit and inside
dominion orbits and rotation cycles.
Some physicists believe that a dark star is actually a frozen deity made
from a cosmic explosion called “A Big Bang Event”. But the theory on Dark Stars
is that they are the result and manufacturing of multiple smaller bangs we
observe to be galactic celestial made by the release of the stars built up
pressure. Inside the dark star is
constantly remolding the frozen ice that surface plates infinitely thick
possess on its surface.
Dark Stars have been re-examined to being black holes instead of dark
stars since 1916 when dark stars play the most unexplained phenomena of the
universe’s matrix. A dark star taking up the characteristics of a black hole
shows conformity of a dark circle surrounded by brighter star or galactic
matter. Like a black hole (dark star) in that lies at the center of our Milky
Way Galaxy they exist as being unknown evolutionary deities. The outer fabric
of the star maintains a resisting material surface which celestial’ spheres
throughout empty space act as a division to measure the distance area between
them. Celestial platonic decay from a
dark star acts to release generating radiation decay the star absorbs from
empty space also asserting space into a vacuum source. During the matrix
generating of the dark star activity absorbing positive radiation throughout
space the dark star grows in diameter its vast presence seems impossible to
observe by any means since it is covered by an existing dark fabric. It is the
same fabric our galaxies and stars impress themselves as part of the revolving
matrix aftermath.
When we view the matrix of physics we look at the presence of the
universe to be flat terrain but short of any afar horizon lays more terrain. In
1776 the world believed the earth to be flat and that if you sailed on a ship
long enough you would fall off the edge. The same idea lays in this new theory
about “The Dark Star Universe “. The dark stars presented are so vast that
observations make it impossible to predict its event horizon or does it have
one at all. Before the advent of modern cosmology, there was considerable talk
about the size and shape of the universe. In 1920, the famous Shapley-Curtis
debate took place between Harlow Shapley and Heber D. Curtis over this issue.
Shapley argued for a small universe the size of the Milky Way galaxy and Curtis
argued that the universe was much larger. The issue was resolved in the coming
decade with Hubble's improved observations.
Edwin Hubble did most of his professional astronomical observing work at
Mount Wilson Observatory, the world's most powerful telescope at the time. His
observations of Cepheid variable stars in spiral nebulae enabled him to
calculate the distances to these objects. Surprisingly, these objects were
discovered to be at distances which placed them well outside the Milky Way.
They continued to be called "nebulae" and it was only gradually that
the term "galaxies" took over. It was also theorized that the Hubble
Expansion theory would be based on the model of an inflating balloon. The
expansion of the universe is based on the fact that the universe expands whole
and complete of a matrix circle proportionate with the growing expansion of the
universe as a whole. It is the Dark Star
Universe theory which invites an explanation to why the universe expands based
on a specific and single point in space. It also gives praise to how space acts
as a vacuum where multiple universe dark star presence may also matrix space as
a whole throughout dark infinity.
The universe is not flat but all internal galactic bodies lay impressed
on top a dark star fabric curvature that coals itself around curled space
forming the fabric itself. Galaxy’s lay throughout a three dimensional surface
laid in astronomical distances measured by the resisting red shift direction of
matter orbiting the star and matrix that also positions the distance away they
recede away from the dark star itself.
Nothing can escape the dark star inner matrix nor can anything enter it
so how do know it’s really there? It was
in 1906 that researching physicists and the acceptance of Albert Einstein’s
ideas about the universe leaned towards the idea to reject “ The Dark Star Universe
Analogy “ that questioned the way the universe or even universe’s were formed
in physics. It is in this book that
criticizes those earlier twentieth century era claims that these dark stars in
the midst of our universes gigantic galaxies where black holes that turned and
twisted allusive radiation and even matter into its event horizon. No proof has
actually shown that these so called black holes actually act in this manner.
IS THE UNIVERSE EXPANDING
Like a balloon is being blown up Rodney Kawecki shows in The Quanta
Physics Theory and in this literature that it is not the universe debris that
is expanding. When we look at the diagram of the universe it sits inside a
space curvature. The space curvature at the top reveals an opening called ‘The
Event Horizon” it is this space and area the matter of the universe rises
towards from the bottom. The weight of the debris planet matter debris that is
the universe rises out from within the primitive big bang event when the
universe first began. As the material
debris that the universe is made of ages it expands. As the debris rotates in
angular-momentum the gravity pushing the debris outwards from the bang it
evolves from as it spins the weight of
the debris forms a deep impression in the fabric of space creating a positive
tension forming a tension grid. It is the density of the tension the universe
matter sustains in the dark spacious element that all the preceding gravity
maintains a specific degree in its chemistry with.
Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which
is a theory that explains why gravity works, ranks as one of the crowning
intellectual achievements of the twentieth century. One implication of general
relativity is the expanding universe. Einstein did not believe this implication
of his theory. He initially envisioned the universe as eternal and static.
Einstein forced his theory to conform to his preconceived ideas about the
universe. To keep general relativity from predicting either an expanding or
collapsing universe, Einstein added a cosmological constant to the general
relativity equations. There is absolutely no experimental or observational
justification for the existence of this cosmological constant. Einstein’s
cosmological constant was a blatant fudge to force his theory to conform to his
conception of a static universe. The universe is not static by general theory
in Quanta Physics the universe is based on three presumptions’. One that
because gravity in space is actually empty space with a uniformity with a
fabric flatland that holds planetary bodies in a gravities dwelling noted as
space curvature. The second holds the
flat space belief materialized by the cosmological constant that space or
gravity of space is infinite in nature but allows matter in it to cruse at
light speed. The third claims that neither are secure explanations about the
universe and how it came to exist.
Claims that the universe is the manifestation by nature and a celestial
living dark and invisible sphere a gigantic dark star manifesting a universe
size mass and quantity which believed to be frozen and allows nothing to enter
it and leave its physical nature not even light. The standard model and most
mysterious question about the universe is where did all this come from? Does a
dark star universe lead to answering this question?
In Quanta Physics Theory we look at the facts that conclude the evidence
brunt forth. How did the universe manifest itself? The standard model claims it
came from nothingness and that everything in it all is in a gigantic sphere
type entity. The real question in Quanta
Physics Theory is what lies behind the third door. We have renewed the theory
about dark star black holes and the universe into a singularity hypothesis. Last and least the final door and its answer
have to be revealed. Can physics do this?
I believe it can.
Quanta Physics holds the last key to the last door that involves the
last question about our universe or any other universe that may exist out
there. Mysterious as it seems something
has to come from somewhere. It is may believe that the answer about where the
universe achieved is shadowed within the matrix of light and darkness. Light has zero mass yet exist darkness has
zero mass yet it exist. One contradicts the others matrix but they both act
exactly alike in nature. Light and darkness like heat and cold by which are a
balance component of space and nature as elements I believe retain the where a
bouts of the key we seek. We observe a space field dark by nature but acting as
a steady state entity but through evidence achieved in physics research
discover that this darken shadowed space field possesses barriers. The measure
deciphering of the big bang theory reveals the nature of a big bang universe
explosion measuring its matter and extreme nature of its explosion. Taking
these deciphered sums we discover that it is an explosion that created the
universe what caused the explosion. Was it a extreme pressure buildup of matter
energy and pressure built up or was it a barrier against dark empty space that
is stretchable, bendable and will curve in its nature that the matter from a
specific point in space built up so much pressure that it collapsed under the
defensive barrier of the space field it materialized in. It seems to me to be evident. Empty space
retains a defensive barrier mechanism that can be seen in curved space planets,
stars and galaxies reside in.
Albert Einstein called the space curvature planets rotate inside
‘gravity wells’. But Quanta Physics looks at these so called ‘Gravity Wells” as
rotating spheres existing in empty space which space field acts proportionate
with the weight of the sphere in question. For cause and effect activity to
exist there doesn’t need a presence of energy mass for the simple reason energy
matter mass is directed towards a center of mass towards a repulsive nucleus
that acts as an allusive mass when gathered by a specific size mass or chunk of
matter. Secondly like energy repel.
A spacecraft in space resides independently a float midfield space with
no doing of itself. As small as it may be it could be attracted towards a much
larger entity. By what is called terminal velocity the ship can overcome the
measure of its repulsive energy mass and maneuver faster towards the celestial
with no problem its matter energy mass is left behind and its propulsion value
takes control. By attraction I mean the weight of its energy mass determined by
terminal velocity that allows for an undetermined rate of velocity to
engage. It’s the measurement of the
ships energy mass that determines how close the ship can actually become in
empty space. For this reason gravity wells need not to be the predecessor for a
planets rotation or spin nature. It could be the presence of pressure
intermediately weighed by the planet matter acting proportionate with the space
curvature it formed due to its presence. It is the classical distance from the
gravity wells fabricated walls the celestial forms by its weight pressure in
its presence that determines the atmospheric distance between the spaces curved
space medium walls and the planet matter itself.
The theory of the dark star as being a frozen sphere invisibly screened
out by empty space that surrounds it is believed to have undergone a mysterious
birth that still is not explainable in any of earth’s theories about where and
how the universe actually came to evolve from.
Its existence is not made in black and white or is it. What we see
verses what we can’t and what lies between them lays the answer. It holds
that from within the fabrics of this
dark star it underwent an implosion or collapse enlightened beginning and
vacuum darken freeze at birth which allowed the vast cold of the infinite
terrain of empty space allusive from any other nearby dark star that might have
existed curving space to act as a wave procured by its presence pushing
anything near it even farther from it but also allowing the vast cold vapors as
it retained its magnitude trying to undermine space curvature create it as a
vast cold vacuum causing its vindictive celestial interior chemistry to become
remolded inside it rendering it physical frozen into darkness and cloaked
itself with the same chemistry as dark empty space.
Using this analogy about the universe we can explain that its release of
pressure might be the manner from which different galaxies formed. Emplaced as similar matter and measured by
their matter density they maneuver impressed against an invisible pressure
towards the dark star center of mass. They rotate within gravity wells masses
that retain the same material résistance of the star inside. The Dark Star
rotates in the same particular manner perpendicular as it is also trapped
inside a deepen matter dwelling due to its vast weight and résistance to the
empty space holding it there.
Hubble and the Expanding Universe
In 1924 Edwin Hubble proved that spiral galaxies were indeed outside our
Milky Way galaxy, when he measured the distance to the Andromeda galaxy. Hubble
continued to measure the distances to galaxies, as well as their Doppler red
shifts, which tell us the speeds at which the galaxies are receding from us.
When Hubble made a graph plotting the recessional speeds of galaxies versus their
distances, he noticed something interesting. The more distant galaxies are
receding from us more rapidly. Hubble’s interpretation of this result is that
the universe is expanding.
Astronomers now call this graph the Hubble plot. The slope of the line
on the Hubble plot is the Hubble constant, and the value of the Hubble constant
tells astronomers how fast the universe is expanding. A steeper slope,
corresponding to a larger value of the Hubble constant, tells astronomers that
the universe is expanding more rapidly.
Einstein learned about Hubble’s result, visited Hubble, and was
convinced that Hubble’s work was correct. Einstein then did what any good
scientist should do when confronted with data that disagree with the theory.
Einstein modified general relativity by removing the cosmological constant and
returning the equations to their original form. To Einstein’s credit he
admitted his error and called the cosmological constant his biggest blunder.
The Accelerating Universe
Ever since Hubble’s time astronomers have been refining the value of the
Hubble constant with more accurate measurements of distances to distant
galaxies two independent teams of astronomers, the Supernova Cosmology Project
and the High-z Supernova Search Team, announced the same remarkable discovery
in 1998. The rate at which the universe is expanding is accelerating.
Perlmutter headed the Supernova Cosmology Project. Schmidt and Riess worked on
the High-z Supernova Search Team.
Both teams used type Ia supernovas to measure the distances to very
distant galaxies. The name “high-z” in fact refers to the large red shifts and
hence large distances of the most distant galaxies. Type Ia supernovas are
explosions that occur in white dwarf stars when they become too massive to
remain stable white dwarf stars. All type a supernovas have very nearly the
same luminosity (total energy output) at their maximum brightness.
Their uniform extremely high luminosities make type a supernovas ideal
for measuring distances to very distant galaxies. How bright a celestial object
appears from Earth depends on the object’s luminosity and distance; therefore
if astronomers know a celestial object’s luminosity and apparent brightness
they can calculate its distance. When these teams of astronomers observed a
type a supernova in a distant galaxy, they used its apparent brightness and the
known luminosity for all type a supernovas to calculate the distance to the
host galaxy.
After using the type Ia supernova to measure the distance to a galaxy,
the astronomers also measured the galaxy’s Doppler red shift, and hence
recessional velocity, to add another datum to the Hubble plot. Their work
showed that the universe was expanding more slowly in the distant past than it
is today. Both teams therefore concluded that the rate at which the universe is
expanding is accelerating.
Einstein’s Cosmological Constant
Why is the expansion of the universe accelerating? Both common sense and
basic physics suggest the opposite. The net gravitational force from all the
mass in the universe should tug galaxies inward and therefore slow the
expansion rate of the universe. Astronomers refer to whatever force is causing
this acceleration in the expansion of the universe as the dark energy and are
puzzled about the nature of the dark energy.
One possible solution is Einstein’s cosmological constant. If
cosmologists put the cosmological constant back into Einstein’s general
relativity equations, then general relativity equations can predict that the
expansion of the universe is accelerating. The value of the cosmological
constant would have to be different than the value Einstein originally used to
force the theory to predict a static universe. The idea basic is however the
same.
The Hyper Universe Dark Star Celestial
Spawn
At the point of no return for anything that falls in — is a spherical
surface. In a higher-dimensional universe, a black hole could have a
three-dimensional event horizon, which could spawn a whole new universe as it
forms.
It could be time to bid the Big Bang bye-bye. Cosmologists have
speculated that the Universe formed from the debris ejected when a
four-dimensional star collapsed into a black hole — a scenario that would help
to explain why the cosmos seems to be so uniform in all directions.
The standard Big Bang model tells us that the Universe exploded out of
an infinitely dense point, or singularity. But nobody knows what would have
triggered this outburst: the known laws of physics cannot tell us what happened
at that moment.
Temperature equilibrium hyper-active time whence haven in the birth of
the cosmos the Universe had an almost completely uniform temperature
incarnation unknown by any single living creature in its dominion Our Universe,
a black hole is bounded by a spherical surface in ordinary three-dimensional
space it takes a two-dimensional object (surface) to create a boundary inside a
collapsed dominion space bubble. In the bulk universe the event of a 4D black
bubble would be a 3D object — a shape called a hyper sphere modeled as a dark
4D star, they find that ejected material erupting from an invisible dark star
would form a 3D brane surrounded by a 3D event horizon slowly expanding in the
amidst of time. Relic radiation that carries imprints of the Universe’s early
moments. The observed patterns match predictions made by the standard model and
inflation that inversely explains a window in space which allows to a
cosmologic model of debris mysteriously finding its presence as a the cosmic
seed that universes appear from.
Despite the mismatch, the Big Bang model singularity is the most
fundamental problem in cosmology and they have rewritten history so that we
never encountered it”. The Planck results “prove that inflation is correct” it
explains the realistic logic that the universe grew from a smaller deity of
composed matter into an infinitely gigantic planetestial model we know as the
universe. The problem about modern
physics theoretical logic is that the whereabouts the matter arises from is
still a mystery.
In Quanta Physics Theory Rodney Kawecki has developed a logical model of
a universe which obeys all the laws of physics but also introduces a new
complicity about faster than light velocity space travel. What Quanta Physics Theory also does allows a
balance in logic that explains the existence of the universe under the same
intermediate logic and theoretical guidelines that the more common existing
galactic bodies in the universe are explained with. Inflation occurs in Quanta physics’ logic
when it tries to explain a development of the universe from its birth and
process of activity that it involves.
Something and everything come from somewhere but in the mystery of our
universe and even the life that exist from it the evolutionary period of an
invisible darken star may retain the answers. Clocked by nature in dark space
even though the standard model persist that even the darken shadows of space
itself were all born all at once in the once singularity of the big bang event
logic might allow us to expand and enlighten the transformation about our
universe and its birth not only by multiple universe logic but also the
foundation of an endless dark space field mass acting as the place for all
existing activity to occur with. In
Quanta Physics Theory we call this “The Dark Star Universe Theory” from which
everything that may have been hid from mankind observation may act as its
threshold. Engraved in a gravity well in
the same manner as all other plantanic bodies are impressed in our four
dimensional universe retains all the fundamental properties that presently
appear amidst a darken 3D celestial body. It generates allusive deeply
impressed matter burst from out of its dense body due to resistance tensioned
by it being trapped in a deep gravity well with no escape that rotates
physically reforming celestial galaxies, nebulas, cluster and stars that lay
impressed and trapped also in its gravity well creating the weight of
formulated planetary bodies at galactic scales to lay embedded and impressed in
the dark stars extremely rigid outer black atmosphere rigid fabric from the
dark stars natural chemistry bending, curving and stretching the trapped
planetary atoms celestial orbiting around the dark stars celestial body as it
twists and turns bound by inflating molecular pressure inside the retained
space.
Do other dark star universes exist amongst our infinite terrain of empty
space? And lastly wouldn’t it be likely that in accordance with the big bang
theory wouldn’t the development of its explosion reform the existence of a
vacuum space field if all was the creation of a single bubble universe
singularity?
the universe is expanding more slowly
than scientists thought, and is 13.8 billion years old, 100 million years older
than previous estimates. The data also show there is less dark energy and more
matter in the universe than previously known.
"Astronomers worldwide have been on the edge of their seats waiting
for this map," said Joan Centrella, Planck program scientist at NASA
Headquarters in Washington. "These measurements are profoundly important
to many areas of science, as well as future space missions. We are so pleased
to have worked with the European Space Agency on such a historic endeavor."
The newly estimated expansion rate of the universe, known as Hubble's
constant, is 67.15 plus or minus 1.2 kilometers/second/mega parsec. A mega parsec
is roughly 3 million light-years. This is less than prior estimates derived
from space telescopes, such as NASA's Spitzer and Hubble, using a different
technique. The new estimate of dark matter content in the universe is 26.8
percent, up from 24 percent, while dark energy falls to 68.3 percent, down from
71.4 percent. Normal matter now is 4.9 percent, up from 4.6 percent.
